Could be. We'll need to run some tests first to see how it performs.pety said:Is it SQLite good enough?
Could be. We'll need to run some tests first to see how it performs.pety said:Is it SQLite good enough?
Database can make things very interesting. It is possible to make impossible things (or at least very difficult to implement).pety said:Flat file XML is the great approach for me and a lot of stations.
I agree to use Lightweight servers. They can be very powerful and do not need both resources and large managers such as Microsoft SQL Server.djsoft said:It'll be light-weight solution of course, no complex database servers to setup.
I agree that can be cumbersome for some users the connection to the database and may arise a lot of queries on the stand.djsoft said:Currently for RadioBOSS 5.6 we want to add custom user fields, but that's mostly for reporting purposes. Custom fields can also be used in filters in Playlist Generator. I'm not sure about database, it's not much work to add this actually, but I also remember "RadioBOSS Pro" experience (years ago), where we used external database, and it was nightmare for customer support![]()
Did not know that it existed a version of RadioBOSS with database."RadioBOSS Pro" experience (years ago), where we used external database
This can be done without database as well... There's already partial artist matching in RadioBOSS. Same can be added for track title too (although this feature was never requested).nelson c said:For example you could identify as:
-The Black Eyed Peas - I Gotta Feeling (Laidback Luke remix)
part of the song:
-The Black Eyed Peas - I Gotta Feeling
(And use this as a filter in PLGen Pro)
This is possible using the Comment field... Database is not required here either. The problem is that UI is not that good for managing using the Comment - and that's going to be improved soon.nelson c said:Songs of the 90s that are slow. (in a very simple way)
Also see a list of these songs very simple. See this link http://www.djsoft.net/smf/index.php/topic,4651.msg22897.html#msg22897
No MSSQL server, that's for surenelson c said:I agree to use Lightweight servers. They can be very powerful and do not need both resources and large managers such as Microsoft SQL Server.
It's buried and it was back in 2004 or so - I don't have a distribution that is able to startnelson c said:Did not know that it existed a version of RadioBOSS with database."RadioBOSS Pro" experience (years ago), where we used external database
Is it possible to send me a download link to test?![]()
It's under development, but I'm not sure if Categories will be there, as 5.6 already has many new features planned.nelson c said:Hi Dimitry, is there a date estimated for RB 5.6 BETA? I am eager to try and help in the implementation of categories.![]()
Yes, custom fields will be added in 5.6. Categories are not complex, but it requires some planning on how it all should work, and I also RB should be prepared for this, at least convert current XML database to embedded SQL (eg SQLite) to make it all manageable.nelson c said:Is very complex of process implement this? Also at a time when talk of custom fields in each song. This be in RB 5.6?