It requires testing to find out the bugsEstoy dispuesto a trabajar gratis en el código de Sigue Editor. Si está interesado podemos seguir la conversación por correo.![]()

It requires testing to find out the bugsEstoy dispuesto a trabajar gratis en el código de Sigue Editor. Si está interesado podemos seguir la conversación por correo.![]()
I was referring to integrating voicetrack into sigue editor. I was doing some tests here with the software that I mentioned and that function is fantastic!It requires testing to find out the bugsFixing is not really a big deal in most cases. There is currently a bug with prelistening the mixes, we'll sort it out in the next release I think.
Returning to the title of the discussion. Here is an idea of how to implement time stamps. I think this could be a good start. By pressing the time we can filter the tracks between those hours. Then the remote voicetrack can only see the time it is assigned.I was referring to integrating voicetrack into sigue editor. I was doing some tests here with the software that I mentioned and that function is fantastic!
I would like to know your opinion about this function
Additionally we need the new audio engine to be able to raise and lower the volumes of a track. (and not just a fadein, fadeout, gain. I'm not sure if the program is ready for this)
For what purpose? It canm lower the volume for voiceovers as configured in Track Tool and under certain other occasions like voice track playback.Additionally we need the new audio engine to be able to raise and lower the volumes of a track. (and not just a fadein, fadeout, gain. I'm not sure if the program is ready for this)
I see it's like a simple filter based on track start times, so it only displays the tracks for a certain hour.Returning to the title of the discussion. Here is an idea of how to implement time stamps. I think this could be a good start. By pressing the time we can filter the tracks between those hours. Then the remote voicetrack can only see the time it is assigned.
Sorry I had skipped this post.I see that it's like using Segue Editor in RadioBOSS that also allows recording voice tracks. The difference here is that the volume of the music is controlled automatically in RadioBOSS and this software is in semi-manual mode.
The idea is to lower your voice when the announcer starts speaking and then raise it when the voicetrack ends. Basically it is to replicate the behavior of voicetrack in follow editor.For what purpose? It canm lower the volume for voiceovers as configured in Track Tool and under certain other occasions like voice track playback.
Voice track recorder can be added into Segue Editor to allow in-place recording; this will be considered for the future versions.
I would like to refer to a post that I read a few years ago in which several people argued that it is better to have "all day in the playlist", and not events that are added from a planner.I see it's like a simple filter based on track start times, so it only displays the tracks for a certain hour.
I clearly subscribe to this idea. Basically the most sophisticated programming programs like Powergold, MusicMaster and Powerselector generate blocks per hour and the excess tracks are discarded. (Every hour goes to a new block).I for one would absolutely support hourly markers. The way the Playlist is created at the moment is structured not too bad, but just not structured as good as it could be, thus needs improving.
When creating a Playlist with hourly markers, it enables you to start the hour off after the News, Weather etc. (voicing in other words), always with strong upbeat fast track. Right now you have the possibility of a slow paced song starting off the hour, and this does not sound good. I cringe when it happens.
We need to have each hour worked out absolutely to a tee as to how we want it to sound.
Hourly structures would just make such a difference for our listeners. Well maybe more for me to put a smile on my face, if I am being absolutely honest about it
So if possible I would like to see it added to Beta 6.
PS
This is actually something I have asked for before, so maybe its been on your list somewhere.
Like pressing the MIC button but also recording a voice track in parallel?I do not know if I clarify it before but at the moment that "rec" is pressed, the reproduction begins ... the announcer could sing on the track for example. After starting to record, the next button is enabled, so that he decides when the next track begins (in the same way that it would be done in a live program).
Even if you have the music tracks for the whole day, the ads and probably other things are still inserted with the scheduler.I would like to refer to a post that I read a few years ago in which several people argued that it is better to have "all day in the playlist", and not events that are added from a planner.
This looks like a totally different way of work. I currently do not see that we'll be changing RadioBOSS radically, to be honest.Basically this is the operation of the most sophisticated programs (and also more expensive)
This is already possible. Make it generate a new playlist every hour and clear the playlist contents. Many people work with RadioBOSS this way. This also fixes the "first track of the hour is slow" because you can make an hour template that will have its very first track "fast".I clearly subscribe to this idea. Basically the most sophisticated programming programs like Powergold, MusicMaster and Powerselector generate blocks per hour and the excess tracks are discarded. (Every hour goes to a new block).
This option is very powerful, but it has the problem that there is no repetition control between two generations. For example, if it is generated all week, the beginning of a generation does not take into account the repetition controls of the previous week.This is already possible. Make it generate a new playlist every hour and clear the playlist contents. Many people work with RadioBOSS this way. This also fixes the "first track of the hour is slow" because you can make an hour template that will have its very first track "fast".
Not really. I think the idea was not understood.Like pressing the MIC button but also recording a voice track in parallel?
Even if you have the music tracks for the whole day, the ads and probably other things are still inserted with the scheduler.
Repeating restrictions between preset was always a problem in gen pro playlist.This option is very powerful, but it has the problem that there is no repetition control between two generations. For example, if it is generated all week, the beginning of a generation does not take into account the repetition controls of the previous week.
Some kind of replay buffer would be useful to handle this. (It is the way they work the aforementioned software)
Is there a way to run with macros the next hour?This way every hour starts clean. You can prepare the 24 playlists in advance to ensure the playlists are ready when they are needed: https://manual.djsoft.net/radioboss/en/generating-multiple-playlists.htm
This is not the case. If you create playlists in one go (as described in the article I've linked above), they all share the same repeat protection buffer.This option is very powerful, but it has the problem that there is no repetition control between two generations. For example, if it is generated all week, the beginning of a generation does not take into account the repetition controls of the previous week.
I don't think that RadioBOSS will support something like this in the near future, to be honest. Maybe we'll open a kind of API to allow users creating like custom Segue Editor with such capabilities - however I'm not sure many people will both er with this.When "rec" is pressed, the playback of the next editor (in cue) starts, so that while the tracks are being recorded, you can listen to the songs that will be in the background. (in the same way as when operating live).
It's totally differeent from the way how RadioBOSS and its scheduler operates. This is also true for the "hour programming" and "grids" - when we designed RadioBOSS, we deliberately moved out of this concept.Thinking high: the handling of blocks, allow an event to modify only its block. The next hour will be intact. Now this could cause some problems with advertising eg events that should not be skipped.
You can have one event that creates 24 playlists for the whole day in one go. Then another event that starts those playlists at the top of each hour. This is the simplest way.Is there a way to run with macros the next hour?
Example **: 59 min would be the appropriate time for the next block to load. (since the current track must be finished).
I need to achieve something like ?hh+1. (As exists in gen playlist filters)
I'm thinking that maybe it's already possibleIt's totally differeent from the way how RadioBOSS and its scheduler operates.
Of course, the problem is that in each generation the buffer is lost. It is not possible to share that buffer between different presets, that is the other problem.This is not the case. If you create playlists in one go (as described in the article I've linked above), they all share the same repeat protection buffer.
I know that, RadioBOSS handles the simplest things and I agree that this is not the idea of development. But it is also more versatile and allows it to be integrated into a lot of situations.It's totally differeent from the way how RadioBOSS and its scheduler operates. This is also true for the "hour programming" and "grids" - when we designed RadioBOSS, we deliberately moved out of this concept.
Yes, there is the playlist TABNAME command to switch playlist tabs: https://manual.djsoft.net/radioboss/en/scheduler_commands.htmIs there a command to load a playlist in a certain tab?
The same to pass the playback activates a certain tap.
Only two commands are really needed, they can be useful to make the program more flexible, even maybe they already exist.
If you create playlists in one go (using the "Create multiple playlists" tool) then the repeat protection buffer is shared. Different presets or one preset, does not matter.Of course, the problem is that in each generation the buffer is lost. It is not possible to share that buffer between different presets, that is the other problem.
They are design issues, I don't think a solution for this is easy.
The current feature set more or less allows to build hourly programming. You can have a "top of the hour" event that clears the playlist and loads the next hour, for instance.I know that, RadioBOSS handles the simplest things and I agree that this is not the idea of development. But it is also more versatile and allows it to be integrated into a lot of situations.